6° of Aberration

Looking for my alter ego...I'm sure I left it someplace around here...

Name:
Location: California, United States

Wednesday, June 30, 2004

Bookworms and Blogs

[Warning: Contains hints for the solution to Monday's brain teaser. So if you haven't tried solving it yet, check it out before continuing.]

*

Ever discover a new favorite blog (this one, perhaps?) and get the feeling that the conversational thread is confusing because you missed some of the earlier postings?

It is the organizational nature of blogs to post in "reverse chronological order" with the most recent entries at the top, the assumption being that that makes it most convenient for readers wanting immediate access to current content.

But imagine a 9 paragraph conversational thread that unfolds as equal size postings over a period of 3 days. Rather than traverse the thread in one direction, reading paragraphs 1 through 9 in sequence as you would a book or journal, you are confronted with the following odd paragraph ordering:

Today: 7 8 9   Yesterday: 4 5 6   Two days ago: 1 2 3
There are instances where this organization can be especially frustrating. I recently reviewed several thousand pages of attorney-client correspondence arranged in reverse chronological order. I couldn't just review the documents from back-to-front, because most of the documents were multi-paged and that created a tiresome back-and-forth game of hide-and-seek. But reading the documents as they were arranged was equally bothersome as I frequently read the resolution to an unfamiliar dispute or the conclusion to a negotiation point that I had not yet encountered.

Nevertheless, even with the convenience of hyperlinks and bookmarks, the non-linear blog method of organization with current material effectively stacked on top of older material is here to stay. Presumably this satisfies the majority.

*

If you're still waiting for hints to the solution to Monday's puzzle, note the most common mistakes:

The answer is not 15" as is often guessed by those who correctly determine that each volume is 1.25" thick and then multiply that thickness by 12. (Nor is it 12" as miscalculated by those who forget to add both covers to each volume for an incorrect measurement of 1" per volume.)

Many careful individuals therefore conclude that the correct answer is 14.5" assuming the bookworm chews her way through all but the two outside covers. But that answer is also wrong. So if you made any of the preceding guesses, go back and try again and I'll give the solution tomorrow.

Tuesday, June 29, 2004

"Excuse me, did you not see any warning signs?"

When Andrew started embarrassing the hell out of us at a restaurant the other night by drawing a bloody ninja scene on his placemat, I imagined what would happen if he exercised the same creativity in the classroom. Let's hope he soon returns to sports scenes like the one he drew of himself sweating profusely in a Michael Jordon jersey, entitled, "This is me winning at basketball."

His first foray into lurid graphics came several weeks ago. It was a violent scene that looked less like refrigerator art (the guests might lose their appetite) and more like the drawings they use in movies to signal the child with unvoiced neuroses. It was an elaborate scene with jet fighters, crashing aircraft, parachuting commandoes, a man with a gun standing over a prone victim, and a smiling soldier in green camouflage. He titled it (complete with the requisite backward S, squeezed in letters, and mixed upper and lower case), "A army man sent his man to batl the bad guys."

But his recent placemat artwork is more conspicuously focused on his vision. He fully intended to sit there filling the entire page with a pile of bloody ninja bodies strewn in a state of total mayhem and reminiscent of the carnage at the Japanese nightclub in Kill Bill, Vol. 1 where O-Ren Ishii's killer squad of Crazy 88s falls to Uma Thurman's sword. (And no, Andrew did not stay up for a midnight screening with his dad.)

After he had heaped on eight dying ninja's, Justin proposed he add a dragon. It took some convincing before he acquiesced and added a green yet bloodied fire-breathing dragon impaled on a sword tossed up at him by the smiling hero in blue shirt and red slacks.

I suggested to Andrew that his next picture be one of a boy and girl in love, but he scoffed at me. He and Justin then went on to plan how to develop a whole comic book, "Treasure Quest," around this initial drawing; they decided that the comic book could also serve as the inspiration for a movie that Andrew would direct and both would star in.

When I pointed out they wouldn't be allowed in to see such a movie, that didn't trouble them at all. They said it could be rated PG-18 and they would see it when they were older.

On the drive home, as we discussed art and I probed for buried concerns in my happy-go-lucky child, Andrew informed me, "Daddy, if a lot of people go see my movie and like it, that would please me and make me happy."

Sure, Andrew, you and Quentin Tarantino, both.

Monday, June 28, 2004

Bookworms -- A Brain Teaser

Reading through and editing blogs reminds me of an old brain teaser I faced years ago as a child.

Here's the problem, as best as I can re-create it from memory:

Imagine you have a twelve volume set of books sitting in order on the bookshelf. Each 400 page volume is exactly the same size: the covers are each .25" thick and 400 pages is .75" thick.

So if a bookworm begins eating on page one of volume one and, following a straight line, continues eating until she reaches the last page of the final volume, how far has she traveled?

The answer may surprise you.

Sunday, June 27, 2004

Problems with Potter

[Warning: contains spoilers for "Harry Potter & the Prisoner of Azkaban."]

In fairness, I have to admit that when I finished reading "The Tale of Despereaux" to the boys during two marathon nights of reading, they loved it. Whatever faults I found, detailed elsewhere, bothered them less than I expected. I loved it though, when Justin turned DiCamillo's own language back at her during the final pages, scoffing, "What?? Soup!! That's ridiculous!"

I still stand by my original comments, but it's also true that the boys did enjoy the book. [We're still waiting to hear whether Ashey & Jack did too...and whether their dad ever did take out the garbage.]

My surprise came when all three boys then pleaded their case for me to read Harry Potter next. Hmmm, it seems that their buddy Kevin is having his mom read Book 3, The Prisoner of Azkaban to him so he can see the movie. Okay, okay, so I agreed and that's what we're reading now...unless I start having boys waking up with nightmares.

But I confess, I have a bone or two to pick with J. K. Rowling.

No argument at all from me that the phenomenon of her books are helping to get many kids to read, to read more, and to be read to by their parents which has also been demonstrated to be invaluable.

And no complaints from me about her books being satanic. That's just ridiculous.

But as I contemplate reading the entire Harry Potter series to the boys, I have already concluded, "Sorry. Not gonna happen." I'll read them the first volume, possibly the second. But after that there are just too many other wonderful alternatives out there for me to invest so much time reading them the 700+ pages of Book 4 and nearly 900 pages of Book 5. So many many wonderful classics to choose from ("The Narnia Chronicles," "The Hobbit," "A Wrinkle in Time") and so many modern writers creating brilliant works (Philip Pullman, Cornelia Funke, David Almond, Sharon Creech, Jack Gantos, Louis Sachar, Gail Carson Levine, Polly Horvath, Rodman Philbrick, Andrew Clements, Kevin Henkes): I simply refuse to help them all get lost under the avalanche of words pouring from the excessive contributions of the marginally talented, though imaginative, Ms. Rowling.

(Just figure: the parent lucky enough to manage 20 pages per night, five nights a week, will take half a year just to read the 2689 pages through Book 5, and possibly 39 weeks, an entire school year, reading the projected 7 books. No, thank you. You're good, Ms. Rowling, but you don't get exclusive ownership of my kids' fantasy universe and the time I spend reading to my boys.)
OK, but "marginally talented?" you ask. Unfair I admit, but let's look at a few problems, because I think she gets away with quite a lot.

Take Azkaban: 400 pages to tell a story that she ends by cheating, using one of the most taboo devices of all--Oh, hey, guess what? Hermione can fix it all just by traveling with Harry back in time and changing things. What?? Has she read no science fiction whatsoever? Introduce time travel and you have a sticky conundrum that requires careful plotting and an ability to make some things possible without just providing a "magic wish" that makes everything turn out okay. After all, if Harry Potter can travel in time, why not just do so to solve every problem? Why not undo countless wrongs? Why not bring back his parents even? Does Rowling even address these questions? (I haven't had the heart to plow through Book 4 to learn whether Hermione gets to keep the time machine.) I tell stories to six year old boys every night. They have learned already the meaning of "deus ex machina." There will be no gods suddenly lowered from the ceiling to save the protagonists of our stories.

Narrative arc: maybe by Book 4 she's thrown out the template of making each story begin with Harry's summer and end with the close of the school year, but for me it kills the suspense. Still winter break? OK, I'll go back into hibernation because this whole thing won't be resolved until the end of the term anyway. With a plot that is contained to the action of a month or a week you get some dramatic tension...but insisting upon drawing the threat out for an entire school year diminishes the immediacy just to keep Rowling's tidy little seven volume structure. Ho humm.

Quidditch: okay, this is surely speaking heresy, but am I the only one to feel the rules of the game sound, well, stupid? All kinds of flying and chasing and goal defending and scoring on broomsticks, but everything is erased by one catch of a special ball by one player? It makes for great special effects, and some perilous situations for Harry, but as a sport it sounds exciting to watch, but pointless to cheer about. (On the other hand, I've never watched cricket either, so maybe it's a cultural thing.)

(And don't even get me started on all the random point awarding by the professors. You either have a guideline for awarding and deducting points and you follow it, or you have a rebellion against favoritism by the students, and an outcry of "rabbit out of the hat" endings by readers--at least you should have.)

Slytherin: if they are just a house full of dark wizards and witches why even keep them around?

Ok, ok, the Potter series is fun and I'm all for both adults and kids enjoying them, but let's not lose perspective. And let's keep the kids sampling other, more talented authors.

Saturday, June 26, 2004

Summer Fun...and Some Are Not.

Why would anyone be foolish enough to wake their kids early on Saturday mornings, especially now that it's summer? But that's exactly what many of us seem to be doing; at least those of us with kids on swim team.

This morning it was a seven-club relay swim meet. We had to be out the door by 7:30 even though the meet itself didn't begin until 9:00. Swim relays, it turns out, are more interesting than individual events--provided your child makes the relay team. In our case, Kevin is one of the four boys on our club's "six and under" team. Andrew is an alternate. Justin, who's joining swim team for the first year and has some catching up to do, did not make the relay team (nor did most of the other boys).

So at 7:30 I left with Kevin and Andrew, with Kathy and Justin planning to join us later. We found a shady spot, lathered up with sunscreen, and soon learned that all the boys were there, which meant Andrew would not be swimming. He had been forewarned and when I told him he took it quite well, still eagerly joining in the team cheers and then finding friends nearby to hang out with.

Swim meets are the classic example of "hurry up and wait." Usually, with three boys competing in three to four events each, we spend about three hours in the sun or frigid evening breezes to participate in no more than five minutes of swimming.

The girls go first in each age group, so the "six and under" girls raced and narrowly won their freestyle event during the final lap while we gathered to watch the boys. The boys' race was not as close, but again our team won, and all three of my boys seemed happy.

Two events to go. But first, much waiting as all the other age levels competed in the freestyle relay.

Then when Kevin's group was lining up for their second event I spotted one of his teammates crying and the coach frantically trying to calm him down. "Where's Andrew?" she asked in desperation as the seconds to the meet ticked down.

"I'll get him," I said, and dashed off. I found him having a snack, and with a hurried explanation I took the snack away and whisked him off, saying that he had to be ready in case the team needed him.

Oops!

Of course, any fool would know that by the time I returned (in under sixty seconds) the other boy's little goggle crisis (as it turned out) would be solved. So there I am with Andrew as high as a kite and ready to step in for his team, but no longer needed. Both his coach and I explained it to him and for a while he held it together.

His team went on and won their second relay event which meant a second cool medal for Kevin.

Now Andrew's disappointment was becoming tangible as I slowly realized just how much worse I had made things. Even as it dawned on me, too late, both what I had done and how it would be kinder to let the alternate swimmers enter at least one of the relay events, the morning continued as scheduled.

By the end of the third and final event for the young boys, Andrew was gradually becoming inconsolable. Another lesson learned. Justin was content; Kevin was excited (but not obnoxiously so); yet poor Andrew understandably struggled to overcome his disappointment at not having been able to swim in the one event.

This is the kind of experience other parents often ask us about. It's one of the many times when the boys see that not everything in their lives is equal or fair.

I think we're doing much better than I ever imagined, navigating these treacherous child-rearing seas, but this morning, compounded as it was by Dad's unthinking hastiness, was one reminder that some events will go much better than others.

Still, it worked out. Andrew felt better after lunch (McDonald's, his favorite) and seems fully mended.

And if we're right (just don't ask the boys), it will all even out over time.

Friday, June 25, 2004

Serendipity

So how does this happen?

In December, I walk into the tiny one room Atherton Library, which can't be any larger than 1800 square feet, and I find "Pattern Recognition" by William Gibson waiting for me. Within a paragraph I'm intrigued, a page and I'm hooked, and by the end of chapter one I'm prepared to sit outside the library and read in the shaded redwood grove until dusk if I can get away with it.

Five hours' New York jet lag and Cayce Pollard wakes in Camden Town to the dire and ever-circling wolves of disrupted circadian rhythm.

It is that flat and spectral non-hour, awash in limbic tides, brainstem stirring fitfully, flashing inappropriate reptilian demands for sex, food, sedation, all of the above, and none really an option now...

She knows, now, absolutely, hearing the white noise that is London, that Damien's theory of jet lag is correct: that her mortal soul is leagues behind her, being reeled in on some ghostly umbilical down the vanished wake of the plane that brought her here, hundreds of thousands of feet above the Atlantic. Souls can't move that quickly, and are left behind, and must be awaited, upon arrival, like lost luggage.

She wonders if this gets gradually worse with age: the nameless hour deeper, more null, its affect at once stranger and less interesting?

Numb here in the semi-dark, in Damien's bedroom, beneath a silvery thing the color of oven mitts, probably never intended by its makers to actually be slept under. She'd been too tired to find a blanket. The sheets between her skin and the weight of this industrial coverlet are silky, some luxurious thread count, and they smell faintly of, she guesses, Damien. Not badly, though. Actually it's not unpleasant; any physical linkage to a fellow mammal seems a plus at this point.

Damien is a friend.

Their boy-girl Lego doesn't click, he would say.

--"Pattern Recognition," by William Gibson
This leads to a Gibson-fest and by the time I'm finished, I'm ready for more more more. Lucky me, I discover to my amazement that all three previous novels ("Idoru," "Virtual Light," and "All Tomorrow's Parties") are available to me in perfect hardcover volumes on my bookshelves at home.

In April or May, I return to the Atherton Library and this time discover "Sunset and Sawdust" by Joe R. Lansdale. Once again, within a few paragraphs I'm hooked. I read it in two days and conclude that this is Lansdale's crossover novel. But he couldn't have progressed this far in a single novel--from his pulp fiction roots which combine excessive plots, bizarre characters, crude redneck dialog, and fantasy elements in ways that I've always believed assured his permanent residence in Obscurity, Texas--could he?

So of course, I back up and within a few weeks I've located and read "Freezer Burn" and "A Fine Dark Line." I am witness to the metamorphasis of a writer.

My brief Lansdale fix satiated, I return to several children's books I've been meaning to read including "The Tale of Despereaux" which I read aloud to the boys.

Then on a bet I find myself attempting to read and finish "Fourplay" by Jane Moore before Val can make her way through "Sunset and Sawdust." After about fifty pages, I decide I'd rather read the yellow pages...in Latin. But a bet's a bet so I press on, pausing only to return "A Fine Dark Line" to the Atherton Library.

Big mistake.

There, insisting to be read is "The Fortress of Solitude," by Jonathan Lethem. I've read Lethem before, both his first novel, "Gun, With Occasional Music" which also is obscure and bizarre (science fiction noir?), and years later, "Motherless Brooklyn," which is the brilliantly original story of a detective suffering from Tourette's Syndrome:

Context is everything. Dress me up and see. I'm a carnival barker, an auctioneer, a downtown performance artist, a speaker in tongues, a senator drunk on filibuster. I've got Tourette's. My mouth won't quit, though mostly I whisper or subvocalize like I'm reading aloud, my Adam's apple bobbing, jaw muscle beating like a miniature heart under my cheek, the noise suppressed, the words escaping silently, mere ghosts of themselves, husks empty of breath and tone. (If I were a Dick Tracy villain, I'd have to be Mumbles.) In this diminished form the words rush out of the cornucopia of my brain to course over the surface of the world, tickling reality like fingers on piano keys. Caressing, nudging. They're an invisible army on a peacekeeping mission, a peaceable horde. They mean no harm. They placate, interpret, massage. Everywhere they're smoothing down imperfections, putting hairs in place, putting ducks in a row, replacing divots. Counting and polishing the silver. Patting old ladies gently on the behind, eliciting a giggle. Only--here's the rub--when they find too much perfection, when the surface is already buffed smooth, the ducks already orderly, the old ladies complacent, then my little army rebels, breaks into the stores. Reality needs a prick here and there, the carpet needs a flaw. My words begin plucking at threads nervously, seeking purchase, a weak point, a vulnerable ear. That's when it comes, the urge to shout in the church, the nursery, the crowded movie house. It's an itch at first. Inconsequential. But that itch is soon a torrent behind a straining dam. Noah's flood. That itch is my whole life. Here it comes now. Cover your ears. Build an ark.

"Eat me!" I scream.

--"Motherless Brooklyn," by Jonathan Lethem
But this time I find myself previewing "The Fortress of Solitude," thinking, "Hmmm, interesting...very interesting..." when I discover a testimonial from Michael Chabon--whose Pulitzer Prize winning novel, "The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay," I first read this past year--and he absolutely raves about it. I flip to the book jacket and read the words that make my temples pulse:

This is the story Jonathan Lethem was born to tell.
Marketing hype, maybe, but can you imagine someone writing those words about a novel you've labored through sweat and tears to bring into existence?

So I race home with a new novel to devour and begin it as soon as the boys are down for the night. I'm as stoked as Justin has been all day as he continuously bounced off the walls asking, "Daddy, are you going to read any more of 'H. Potter' to us tonight?"

I too have a new winner.

Just don't tell Val.

Thursday, June 24, 2004

Book List

I recently received this book list naming the selections of a reading club for the upcoming year. I decided to add my two cents:

September: "A Widow for One Year," by John Irving. --I became an avid Irving fan long before any of his books reached the screen. But I must have grown tired of him after "A Prayer for Owen Meany," because I stopped reading him until this past year ("The Fourth Hand," which was decent), even though both Widow and "A Son of the Circus" sit unread on my bookshelf. Maybe it's time for a new season of Irving.

October: "Prey," by Michael Crichton. --How did I manage to miss this one? I usually enjoy Crichton's sci-fi plots, all the way back to "The Andromeda Strain," and I generally find him to be a quick read. I'm looking forward to reading, "Prey." (Real Crichton afficionados will have read the much older and largely overlooked, "Eaters of the Dead.")

November: "Founding Brothers," by Joseph Ellis. --Had never heard of it; not my typical choice. If it comes highly recommended, I'll give it a look.

December: "The Golden Compass," by Philip Pullman. --I read this one last year and enjoyed it, but not so much that I felt like completing the trilogy ("His Dark Materials") in one sitting. Nevertheless, it is imaginative and well-written and I enjoyed Pullman's descriptions of the personal daemons. It's usually shelved in the Young Adult section, but kids "reading up" may find parts of it too frightening.

January: "The Dew Breaker," by Edwidge Danticat. --Another that had not made it to my radar screen. Interesting premise: the tale of a Haitian immigrant to the U.S. who was a former prison guard skilled in torture. Maybe the interested reader might dare to couple it with "Time's Arrow," Martin Amis' postmodern story of an ex-Nazi doctor, Tod Friendly, whose life is played out in reverse--literally "reverse"--beginning with his death and progressing to the womb like a movie reel played backwards with characters walking backwards, water running up into showerheads, and thousands of Jews being returned to life.

February: "Little Children," by Tom Perrota. --(Hey, Tom, didn't you work at NUSC with this guy?) Wow! Here's how Publisher's Weekly summarizes the plot:

The characters in this intelligent, absorbing tale of suburban angst are constrained and defined by their relationship to children. There's Sarah, an erstwhile bisexual feminist who finds herself an unhappy mother and wife to a branding consultant addicted to Internet porn. There's Todd, a handsome ex-jock and stay-at-home dad known to neighborhood housewives as the Prom King, who finds in house-husbandry and reveries about his teenage glory days a comforting alternative to his wife's demands that he pass the bar and get on with a law career. There's Mary Ann, an uptight supermom who schedules sex with her husband every Tuesday at nine and already has her well-drilled four-year-old on the inside track to Harvard. And there's Ronnie, a pedophile whose return from prison throws the school district into an uproar, and his mother, May, who still harbors hopes that her son will turn out well after all.
What's not to like?

(And I thought the aforementioned Martin Amis was getting out there with "Yellow Dog.")

March: "This Boy's Life," by Tobias Wolff. --Good choice. Along with Mary Karr ("The Liars' Club," and later, "Cherry;" both excellent), Wolff is one of the names I most often hear credited with the resurging popularity for gritty memoirs.

April: "The Talented Mr. Ripley," by Patricia Highsmith. --I'm guessing that more than a few book club members are going to cheat and watch the movies, but I too wanted to pull out the book after seeing this one. Although I haven't read it yet, how convenient for me that it appears anthologized in one of the American Noir volumes from my Library of America collection.

May: "Things Fall Apart," by Chinua Achebe. --Good luck. I know absolutely nothing about it...except that there are Cliffs Notes. ;-)

June: "House of Sand and Fog," by Andre Dubus. --Good choice. Well-written, believable, symapthetic characters, a local setting (for me, anyway), and a tough climatic ending. I took Val to the movie and she felt sucker-punched.

All things considered, sounds like a damn fine list.

Wednesday, June 23, 2004

Keep the wrapping paper

A few nights ago I began somewhat reluctantly reading "Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" to the boys who had insisted upon it (more on that another time).

Early on there is a description of Harry's spoiled cousin Dudley's birthday party. Dudley counts his gifts and then whines that he only received thirty-six presents, two less than the previous year. His parents quickly correct that by offering more and Dudley ends up the recipient of a racing bike, a computer, a VCR, sixteen computer games, a remote control airplane, and a gold watch.

I expected a reaction from the boys, but they seemed unfazed.

The next night I read them a scene where Harry realizes he is about to turn eleven:

Of course, his birthdays were never exactly fun--last year, the Dursleys had given him a coat hangar and a pair of Uncle Vernon's old socks. Still, you weren't eleven every day.
Once again, no reaction.

I was sure they mustn't have heard what I'd read, so I asked them about it. "Did you hear that?" I asked. "Remember when Dudley got thirty-nine presents? Do you remember what he got?" They demonstrated that they recalled almost everything.

"And what did Harry get?" They answered correctly.

"So what did you think of that?"

"Well," said Andrew, barely pausing to consider it, "I wouldn't care about the old socks, but I'd like the coat hangar. I could use it to make a jet fighter, or I could make a zip line for Max Steele. Or...I could get a cardboard box and use the hangar and make a robot; I could use the socks for feet..." I finally had to cut him off or he'd be inventing still.

I told Andrew I was impressed. I told all of them I was proud of how unselfish they are...but I'd wager they are puzzled by my compliments.

Tuesday, June 22, 2004

Two...No, Three...OK, Four Indispensable Anthologies

Janet Schulman had a great idea when she compiled many favorite and soon-to-be-favorite children's stories into two wonderful read-aloud anthologies. These are great books to have, whether at home, at grandma's, or especially while on the road: during your next trip, rather than pack a trunkful of books weighing twice your toddler, just make sure to bring one of these. It's like tossing a whole shelf full of books into the car.

"The 20th Century Children's Book Treasury," selected by Janet Schulman. This volume has 44 stories, from wordless books to picture books to short read-aloud stories, conveniently color-coded and indexed, making it easy to find something age-appropriate and the length you desire. The stories are complete with only a few illustrations omitted, and the large format is a comfortable size to prop in your lap while a giggle of little ones cuddle close by. It includes many of our favorite stories and undoubtedly some most children will recognize:

"Where the Wild Things Are,"
"Chicka Chicka Boom Boom,"
"Good Night, Gorilla,"
"Guess How Much I Love You,"
"Alexander & the Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Day,"
"Make Way for Ducklings,"
"Goodnight Moon,"
"Curious George,"
"Miss Nelson is Missing,"
"The Tub People,"
"Amelia Bedelia,"
"The Sneetches," and many more.
It's a must-have for parents of little ones.

"You Read to Me & I'll Read to You," selected by Janet Schulman. This anthology is the next step up from the previous book, containing 26 stories for beginning readers. Once again, it includes many of our favorites and others that probably are familiar:

"Flat Stanley,"
"Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs,"
"Horton Hatches the Egg,"
"Catwings,"
"The True Story of the 3 Little Pigs,"
"Mrs. Gorf" (the first chapter from "Sideways Stories from Wayside School),
"Freckle Juice," and others.
I've discovered that a story that may not interest a child one day, may become a favorite a few months later.

And the price of this book was easily recovered the first time I read "Flat Stanley" to the boys. Someone once confessed to me that this odd little story with a twisted sense of humor had been a childhood favorite, but I hadn't been able to locate it because he had mis-recalled the title. So imagine my surprise when I discovered I already owned it in this anthology. And imagine my even greater delight while reading it to my boys (about four years old at the time) when they began laughing so uncontrollably that tears rolled down their cheeks and they begged me to reread favorite passages until I finally insisted they go to bed.

OK, so you have older children and are looking for something a bit more mature?

No problem, Jim Trelease has you covered with "Hey! Listen to This: Stories to Read Aloud." A fanatical promoter of the benefits of reading aloud to children (see The Read-Aloud Handbook) Trelease here collects about 50 excerpts from many classics and other lesser-known books for older children. You'll find plenty to choose from, arranged by theme, and as you sample them, it will help you prepare a list of books to get at the library and will help inspire a love of reading together with your child. Selections include:

"Homer Price,"
"Charlotte's Web,"
"Ozma of Oz,"
"Ramona the Pest,"
"Where the Red Fern Grows,"
"James and the Giant Peach,"
"Gentle Ben,"
"Black Beauty,"
"The Emperor's New Clothes,"
"The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe,"
"Mr. Popper's Penguins," and dozens more.
Finally, I have one last recommendation, a much more challenging and less accessible book with arguably the worst title of any on my bookshelves: "Stories and Poems for Extremely Intelligent Children of All Ages," selected by Harold Bloom.

That's right: literary genius, celebrated Sterling Professor of Humanities at Yale, and indefatigable author of such books as "Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human," "The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry," "Genius: A Mosaic of One Hundred Exemplary Creative Minds," and "How to Read and Why," has set his sights on anthologizing stories and poems from the nineteenth century (and earlier) with the goal of inspiring a lifelong love of reading.

According to Bloom, who decries the term "Children's Literature" and fears the "dumbing-down that is destroying our literary culture:"

If readers are to come to Shakespeare and to Chekhov, to Henry James and to Jane Austen, then they are best prepared if they have read Lewis Carroll and Edward Lear, Robert Louis Stevenson and Rudyard Kipling.

So here you'll find samplings of works by Melville, Tolstoy, Whitman, Twain, Wilde, Emerson, Hawthorne, Poe, and Shakespeare himself. Don't tell your kids you're advancing their cultural literacy or saving them from the lures of television, video games, DVD's, and the internet. Just open to a verse or story that looks interesting and dive in.

And good luck explaining the title to your friends who spot this volume on your coffee table.

Monday, June 21, 2004

It was a dark and stormy night

That hackneyed line has many people thinking only of Snoopy sitting atop his doghouse typing his Great American novel. The actual quote is, let's just say, a tad longer and less poetic, and thanks to the English Department at San Jose State University, one of the most infamous examples of "wretched writing." The full quote reads:

"It was a dark and stormy night; the rain fell in torrents--except at occasional intervals, when it was checked by a violent gust of wind which swept up the streets (for it is in London that our scene lies), rattling along the housetops, and fiercely agitating the scanty flame of the lamps that struggled against the darkness."
--Edward George Bulwer-Lytton, "Paul Clifford" (1830)
Inspired by that quote, the good folks at SJSU decided to sponsor an annual literary competition for the worst opening sentence to a hypothetically awful novel. This bad writing competition began over twenty years ago and continues to attract submissions by thousands of contestants worldwide who tend to fall into two classes (according to Scott Rice the professor who started it all): "good writers pretending to be bad writers, and bad writers pretending to be good writers pretending to be bad writers."

Here is the original winning entry from 1983:

The camel died quite suddenly on the second day, and Selena fretted sulkily and, buffing her already impeccable nails--not for the first time since the journey began--pondered snidely if this would dissolve into a vignette of minor inconveniences like all the other holidays spent with Basil.

--Gail Cain, San Francisco, California (1983 Winner)
Here are a few other winners in years to follow:

As the fading light of a dying day filtered through the window blinds, Roger stood over his victim with a smoking .45, surprised at the serenity that filled him after pumping six slugs into the bloodless tyrant that mocked him day after day, and then he shuffled out of the office with one last look back at the shattered computer terminal lying there like a silicon armadillo left to rot on the information superhighway.

--Larry Brill, Austin, Texas (1994 Winner)

"Ace, watch your head!" hissed Wanda urgently, yet somehow provocatively, through red, full, sensuous lips, but he couldn't you know, since nobody can actually watch more than part of his nose or a little cheek or lips if he really tries, but he appreciated her warning.

--Janice Estey, Aspen, Colorado (1996 Winner)

The heather-encrusted Headlands, veiled in fog as thick as smoke in a crowded pub, hunched precariously over the moors, their rocky elbows slipping off land's end, their bulbous, craggy noses thrust into the thick foam of the North Sea like bearded old men falling asleep in their pints.

--Gary Dahl, Los Gatos, CA (2000 Winner)
Not all entries are so bloated. There are occasional gems achieved with a dozen words or less:

I was a fifty-four-year-old male virgin but I'm all right now.
--Arden Ohl, Modesto, California

The aliens bent over backwards, literally, to please their visitors.
--Jane Amanda Espenson, Berkeley, California

Just beyond the Narrows, the river widens.
--Warren Tupper Way, Wayzata, Wisconsin

She was in tropical heat.
--Richard Lowe, Wilmington, Delaware
So who the hell was Bulwer-Lytton, you ask. He was a contemporary of Charles Dickens and was widely read in his time, the previous excruciating example of purple prose notwithstanding.

Poor fellow, I thought, when I learned this. He coughs up that opening line and then Dickens comes along and begins publishing such memorable beginnings as:

Whether I shall turn out to be the hero of my own life, or whether that station will be held by anybody else, these pages must show.
--David Copperfield (1849)

Marley was dead: to begin with. There is no doubt whatever about that.
--A Christmas Carol (1843)

Now, what I want is, Facts.
--Hard Times (1854)
And then, of course, how can Bulwer-Lytton ever hope to compete with the unforgettable beginning to "A Tale of Two Cities?"

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times.
Except, little did I realize, the good Mr. Dickens did not actually stop there. Inspired perhaps by Bulwer-Lytton, and maybe wishing to promote his own "bad writing" literary contest one day, he went on to finish his sentence as follows:

It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of Light, it was the season of Darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair, we had everything before us, we had nothing before us, we were all going direct to heaven, we were all doing direct the other way - in short, the period was so far like the present period, that some of its noisiest authorities insisted on its being received, for good or for evil, in the superlative degree of comparison only.

Charles Dickens, "A Tale of Two Cities" (1859)
Give the man his first place prize.


Sunday, June 20, 2004

51 Things I Can't Wait To Do With My Boys

This list is now seven years old. I wrote it during Kathy's pregnancy when I hoped to help her come to terms with becoming the mother of three boys. I don't think it was much help to her--I guess we all have to write our own lists--but I'd like to believe that part of what I was trying to do was to inspire her to attempt the same exercise.

Father's Day seems an appropriate day to reread this list. And after only six and a half years, I'm surprised at how many of these items I could actually check off (knowing that many were tongue-in-cheek).

So here's my original list, "51 Things I Can't Wait To Do With My Boys:"

· Take them to Horseneck Beach and let them run through the dunes where I used to play
· Place them in the arms of their grandparents for the first time
· Introduce them to Isaac Asimov and "I, Robot"
· Pitch a tent in the backyard (whose backyard?) and let them sleep outside alone
· Make photo albums of all their aunts and uncles and tell them tall tales about each one
· Play Scrabble together on a rainy day
· Take turns in a soccer goal and teach them to score with either foot
· Let them milk a cow (Dad grew up in a farm town, after all)
· Show them how to calculate the height of the house by measuring its shadow
· Give them a hose, some sponges, and drink a can of Narragansett Beer while they wash the Suburban (OK, maybe a Coors and a mini-van)
· Take them to a Red Sox game and try to explain "The Curse"
· Play pig pile and hospital tag and flashlight tag (but probably not "kick-the-can")
· Take them to the library and help them pick out books to read together at bedtime
· Go shopping together for Mother's Day and pick out something really special, but undoubtedly tacky
· Read their first stories and marvel at their imaginations
· Fall asleep with them all in one big bed
· Take them sailing, put them in big orange lifejackets, and watch them try to keep their balance when the waves hit
· Eat the leftover crusts from their grilled cheese sandwiches
· Listen to their favorite music and try to understand why it's no stranger than mine
· Take them to the zoo and watch their expressions when they see their first giraffes, hippos, elephants, and monkeys
· Show them what happens when they cut a Mobius strip in half
· Torture them with a Shakespeare Festival and then peak their curiosity by telling them what it was really about
· Take them to Texas and show them what hot really feels like
· Tell them ghost stories until their eyes are as big as saucers
· Take them outside in just their diapers, turn on the sprinkler, and watch them scatter
· Teach them how to write in secret code
· Teach them to throw a frisbee; then bring out one of those amazing Aerobie flying rings
· Bring them home, put them in one big crib, and gaze down at them with their mom and ask, "Well, how did we get here?"
· Watch them scatter their Cheerios all over some restaurant floor
· Empty their pockets while trying not to think about it
· Take them for ice cream, get double scoops, and watch it run down their little fingers
· Leave them with a babysitter and then miss them while we're out shopping for them
· Show them how to make weird sounds by blowing on a blade of grass or between their thumbs
· Go to their first school play and hide my smile when they forget their lines
· Confiscate their hidden issues of Playboy and explain why we don't allow that in our house
· Make sweatshirts with their little handprints for all their aunts and uncles
· Try to answer their questions honestly without sounding like a boring old fart
· Dress them up, comb their hair, and then try to get them to stand still long enough to take a picture for the Christmas card
· Make Mickey Mouse pancakes with chocolate chip smiles
· Teach them to calculate baseball batting averages
· Take them to the beach and lather up their little limbs with SPF 65
· Build cool forts out of cardboard boxes
· Give them their baths, get them squeaky clean, and pop them into their spiderman pj's
· Take them sledding when they're little and skiing when they're older
· Help them with their homework and get excited when they teach me something new
· Show them how to wake up mom with a family hug
· Put band-aids on their skinned knees and apply boo-boo bunnies when they bump their noggins
· Take lots of digital pictures and scan their artwork and send both electronically to their grandparents
· Read to them from "The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe"
· Help them find ways to impress little girls without resorting to frogs or scatological references
· When they misbehave and they're really starting to get on my nerves, tell them to go play in the fallout shelter

Saturday, June 19, 2004

Little Moments

Sometimes you look at your kids and marvel at who they are becoming. Last night we were joining friends for dinner, and their daughter, fourteen-year-old Justine, volunteered to watch the boys. I don't know whether it was the thought of Justine or just the break in routine, but suddenly all three boys eagerly picked out their clothes and got dressed quickly and without complaint. They emerged in three attractive Hawaiian shirt and shorts ensembles and began combing their hair and looking for sunglasses. Andrew even asked whether he could borrow one of my ties, but settled for my straw hat. They seemed like three eager young men getting ready for a big night out.

Later, driving home knowing that we'd kept them up well past their bedtime for the second night in a row, Kathy popped in one of their favorite CD's, "Mud on the Tires" by Brad Paisley.

I don't know when my Irish wife converted my boys into three little Country Western fans, but suddenly they were warbling along gleefully. Justin especially, with an accent he picked up from who-knows-where, happily joined the chorus, singing:

'Cause it's a good night
To be out there soakin' up the moonlight
Stake out a little piece of shoreline
I've got the perfect place in mind
It's in the middle of nowhere only way to get there
You got to get a little mud on the tires
Andrew soon dozed off in an exhausted heap and Kevin waited patiently for his favorite track. It was late and we were all tired and aware that we needed to get up early for a Saturday morning swim meet, but the dark back roads and the sound of Justin's happy voice accompanying Brad Paisley's combined into one of those precious moments that you cannot script and do not want to forget.

I confess that I find the lyrics of Paisley's hit single, "Little Moments," to be condescending and sexist, but like the many others who made the song a hit I find myself nodding in agreement with the refrain, "Yeah I live for little moments like that."

Friday, June 18, 2004

Fairy Tale

"Ella Enchanted," by Gail Carson Levine:

Here's one I can wholeheartedly recommend. It's a retelling of the Cinderella story with a delightful twist and it begins with a terrific opening line:

That fool of a fairy Lucinda did not intend to lay a curse upon me. She meant to bestow a gift.
The "gift" is obedience. Whatever Ella is commanded to do she must do, whether it is to hold a mixing bowl, hop on one foot, or throw herself off a cliff. With this premise, Levine is able to develop a spirited heroine with a lot of pluck, humor, and cleverness. We quickly discover that, "Instead of making me docile, Lucinda's curse made a rebel of me." And so it is easy to be enchanted by Ella and root for her in her quest to find a way of breaking her spell and getting together with Prince Charmont.

All the elements of the Cinderella story are here: the fairy godmother, the wicked stepmother and hateful stepsisters, the Prince, the glass slippers, the pumpkin carriage. But Levine goes far afield from merely retelling the story, using it instead as the mythic context to telling a delightful story about freedom, rebellion, love, and determination. And with the cast of ogres, fairies, giants, and centaurs, she creates a vivid landscape for Ella's adventure. The writing is terrific, the details vivid, and the plot engaging. This one is a winner.

[So why quibble? ...Because I cannot resist adding: No, I have not yet seen the movie, but I understand that it differs greatly from the book; Yes, I thought there were some beasts borrowed from Tolkien's menagerie; No, I did not care for the epistolary sequence towards the end--in fact, I felt it slowed the pace--but I understand that this was one of Levine's favorite sections to write; and Yes, I have heard of "Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister," by Gregory Maguire whose success began with "Wicked." ]

Thursday, June 17, 2004

Mouse Type...or Man's Inhumanity to Mice...

"The Tale of Despereaux," by Kate DiCamillo:

This one was on my radar screen for months, but even when it won the Newbery Award I still didn't get around to it. Then Christine began reading it to her children at night, and her description was so amusing and her imitation of Despereaux's mother's French accent so hilarious, that I had to track it down immediately.

"This is the last...I will have no more mice babies. They are such the disappointment. They are hard on my beauty. They ruin, for me, my looks. This is the last one. No more."
Even the boys began imitating Christine's husband, Rod, who had joined the audience, taking turns pleading, "Awww, Honey, I want to hear the next chapter, too. Can't I just take out the garbage later?"

It began exactly as Christine had described it. Funny, spell-binding, ironic. The asides to the Reader were often flawless and quotable.

"Farewell" is not the word that you would like to hear from your mother as you are being led to the dungeon by two oversize mice in black hoods.

Words that you
would like to hear are "Take me instead. I will go to the dungeon in my son's place." There is a great deal of comfort in those words.
But it has a dark side, also. And as time wore on, and more tragedy ensued, and the asides about "perfidy" and the "ridiculousness of love" mounted, I began wondering how much of this was entertaining the boys and how much was going over their heads. If DiCamillo wanted to add her dark little fairy tale to those of the Brothers Grimm, she succeeded. No one will read this book and forget it. But much of it is unnecessarily dark (indeed the book is all about darkness and light), and frankly I see too much of Lemony Snicket's influence.

Do kids get the joke? Sure they do. And I am amazed that Justin sees through as many of DiCamillo's tricks as he does. But Justin has the gift of a strong moral compass and keen insights into areas of moral ambiguity. Others will listen, and chorus as all my boys do, "That's just mean!"

It's a shame, really, to encounter a book that comes so close to perfect.

We've had fun, certainly, making the drum sounds, chanting "To the dungeon! To the dungeon!" together, and imitating accents and getting exasperated and crying, "Gor! I wish to be one of them itty-bitty princesses."

But a book which could have become a classic and a family favorite will, I predict, make it's way back onto the shelf and be replaced by something more heroic where there is no ambiguity at all about the characters living happily ever after.

Shirley, You Jest

This is merely a test of the blogger scene. Once I discover how easy it is, I will Blog On!